Verilator is not a complete alternative to traditional event driven simulation. Its value is for modeling where the detail (and simulation performance hit) of 4-state logic and intra-cycle behavior are not needed, and where efficient interfacing to software environments are essential.
It is thus important that the Verilator model is consistent throughout with event driven simulation, and so the initial stage of any Verilator modeling is to build the baseline simulation against which it will match. There are three additional reasons why such a baseline simulation is important
Because Verilator follows 2-state, zero delay synthesis semantics, some changes will be needed to the source code. These most commonly will involve substituting non-synthesizable parts of the design. Checking the Verilator model using the substituted code against the original event driven simulation is an essential step.
Verilator models are used typically in environments where performance is very important. In many cases it is possible to rewrite key parts of the Verilog to be far more efficient when modeled cycle accurately. This is commonly the case for memories, where for example, it is not necessary to individually buffer each input and output bit. Again it is essential to be able to compare rewritten code against the original simulation behavior.
Finally Verilator includes powerful linting tools, and will typically throw up huge numbers of diagnostic warnings. It makes a great deal of sense to address all these warnings. They address issues that may cause problems with synthesis and gate level verification. They also highlight areas that can badly impact on model performance.